Hi again Vladimir I can't really help with that - haven't looked at enough Danian Ellipsolithus to say, and for me it looks like a fairly typical E. macellus. However, other people may be able to say something more useful Jeremy > On 7 Mar 2025, at 13:15, Мусатов Владимир <dr.musatov at yandex.ru> wrote: > > ⚠ Caution: External sender > > > Hi Jeremy, > Thank you, I've already downloaded it))) > > I have a question - is it always the case that the base of the NP4 zone contains uncharacteristic small Ellipsolithus macellus? My photo shows an Ellipsolithus macellus similar in appearance to the E. macellus in Plate 3 foto 36 of the Bown et al. paper I requested. These specimens do not look like the typical large E. macellus that occur in NP9 and NP11. Can these small forms be identified as E. macellus, or is it a different species? > How do you think? > > > > Musatov Vladimir > > > <E. macellus_11_11-5К.jpg>_______________________________________________ > Coccoliths mailing list > Coccoliths at fcnym.unlp.edu.ar > https://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/mailman/listinfo/coccoliths -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/pipermail/coccoliths/attachments/20250307/3774d2d7/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1484 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/pipermail/coccoliths/attachments/20250307/3774d2d7/attachment.bin>