<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Hi again Vladimir<div>I can't really help with that - haven't looked at enough Danian Ellipsolithus to say, and for me it looks like a fairly typical E. macellus. However, other people may be able to say something more useful</div><div>Jeremy<br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage"><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 7 Mar 2025, at 13:15, Мусатов Владимир <dr.musatov@yandex.ru> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div>
<div style="background-color:#FFEFD5; padding:1px; "><p style="font-size:11pt; line-height:10pt; font-family: 'Arial','Helvetica',sans-serif;">
⚠ Caution: External sender</p>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>Hi Jeremy,</div>
<div>
<div><span lang="en">Thank you, I've already downloaded it)))</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span lang="en">I have a question - is it always the case that the base of the NP4 zone contains uncharacteristic small Ellipsolithus macellus? My photo shows an Ellipsolithus macellus similar in appearance to the E. macellus in Plate 3 foto 36 of the
Bown et al. paper I requested. These specimens do not look like the typical large E. macellus that occur in NP9 and NP11. Can these small forms be identified as E. macellus, or is it a different species?</span></div>
<div><span lang="en">How do you think?</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Musatov Vladimir</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<span id="cid:23B3BA12-0BBC-4776-9BF4-3E3846E63328"><E. macellus_11_11-5К.jpg></span>_______________________________________________<br>Coccoliths mailing list<br>Coccoliths@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar<br>https://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/mailman/listinfo/coccoliths<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>