To me, It looks like Cretaceous Marthasterites furcatus: http://www.mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?taxon=Marthasterites%20furcatus&module=Mesozoic Best wishes, Ines[Click Me!]<http://www.incredimail.com/app/?tag=emoticon_click_me_im2_re&lang=9&version=6395254&setup_id=7&aff_id=1&tID=613924&addon=IncrediMail&upn=59682E38-2BA4-43E7-81A1-B2570726E0B7&app_test_id=0&id=95202&guid=467C5667-84BD-47DB-96C9-635044051345> From: Coccoliths [mailto:coccoliths-bounces at fcnym.unlp.edu.ar] On Behalf Of ??????? ???????? Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:28 AM To: Young, Jeremy <jeremy.young at ucl.ac.uk>; Coccoliths at fcnym.unlp.edu.ar Subject: Re: [coccoliths] Nannolith inc sed Dear colleagues, very rarely there are nanoliths in the complexes, which I can not identify (see photo) - this is the zone of D. bisectus (late Bartonian). I will be very grateful for the answer. Vladimir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/pipermail/coccoliths/attachments/20171128/c29fa761/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3101 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <http://webmail.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/pipermail/coccoliths/attachments/20171128/c29fa761/attachment.gif>
